Your Complete Guide to Preventing Heart Attacks
Evidence-Based Strategies That Work
This guide provides proven strategies to reduce your risk of heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death, based on large scientific studies involving thousands of patients. Each strategy includes the percentage risk reduction seen in clinical trials. Your physician will help tailor these approaches to your individual risk profile.
Understanding Risk Reduction
The percentages listed below reflect reductions in:
-
Heart attacks
-
Strokes
-
Major cardiovascular events
-
Cardiovascular death
-
All-cause mortality
Benefits are often additive, meaning that combining therapies (medications + lifestyle changes) can dramatically reduce overall risk.
STRATEGIES FOR HEART ATTACK PREVENTION
STATINS
atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin
Risk Reduction
-
20–25% reduction in heart attack, stroke, or cardiovascular death per 39 mg/dL (1 mmol/L) LDL reduction
-
10% reduction in all-cause death
How they work
-
Lower cholesterol production in the liver (enzyme blockade) and increase LDL clearance, which slows plaque growth and stabilizes plaque.
Who needs them
-
Many patients with known coronary disease, high ASCVD risk, diabetes, or elevated LDL; often first-line for LDL lowering.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Dose varies by medication and risk level; your clinician selects intensity and target.
Side effects
-
Muscle aches: 5–10%
-
Serious muscle injury: ~0.1% (rare)
-
Small diabetes risk: ~0.2% per year (benefits typically outweigh this)
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Liver tests may be checked initially; routine ongoing monitoring is often not required unless symptoms arise.
PCSK9 INHIBITORS
evolocumab/Repatha, alirocumab/Praluent, inclisiran/Leqvio
Risk Reduction
-
15–20% reduction in major cardiovascular events
-
27–28% reduction in heart attacks
-
21–27% reduction in stroke
How they work
-
Injectable medications given every 2 weeks, monthly, or twice yearly (depending on type) that dramatically lower LDL by helping the liver remove more cholesterol from the blood.
Who needs them
-
People who cannot tolerate statins, have very high LDL despite maximal statin therapy, or have familial hypercholesterolemia.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Injection schedule depends on agent (q2 weeks / monthly / twice yearly).
Side effects
-
Injection-site reactions (most common).
-
No increase in muscle pain, cognitive problems, or diabetes. Very safe overall.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Minimal monitoring required.
EZETIMIBE
Zetia
Risk Reduction
-
13% reduction in heart attacks when combined with statins
How they work
-
Blocks cholesterol absorption in the intestines.
Who needs them
-
People needing additional LDL lowering beyond statins or unable to use higher-dose statins.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
10 mg daily.
Side effects
-
Generally very well tolerated with minimal side effects.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
No routine monitoring in most patients.
BEMPEDOIC ACID
Nexletol
Risk Reduction
-
FDA-approved to reduce risk of heart attack and coronary procedures.
How they work
-
Oral LDL-lowering therapy through a pathway different from statins.
Who needs them
-
Particularly useful for people who cannot tolerate statins.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
180 mg daily.
Side effects
-
Not specified in your source texts (commonly discussed with your clinician).
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Follow your clinician’s monitoring plan.
ICOSAPENT ETHYL
Vascepa - prescription purified EPA
Risk Reduction
-
25% reduction in major cardiovascular events
-
31% reduction in heart attacks
-
20% reduction in cardiovascular death
-
37% reduction in stroke
How they work
-
Highly purified EPA that reduces triglycerides and inflammation.
Who needs them
-
People with elevated triglycerides (typically ≥135 mg/dL) despite statin therapy.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
4 grams daily (2 grams twice daily with meals).
Side effects
-
Increased atrial fibrillation in about 1% of patients.
-
Slightly increased bleeding risk.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Regular fish oil supplements are NOT recommended—only prescription icosapent ethyl has proven cardiovascular benefit.
ACE INHIBITORS
lisinopril, enalapril, ramipril
Risk Reduction
-
17–22% reduction in major cardiovascular events
-
20% reduction in heart attacks
-
30% reduction in stroke
-
17% reduction in death
How they work
-
Relax blood vessels and reduce strain on the heart.
Who needs them
-
Many patients with hypertension, coronary disease, diabetes, kidney disease, or heart failure—per clinician judgment.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Dose varies; titrated to blood pressure and tolerance.
Side effects
-
Dry cough (10–15%), dizziness, rarely swelling of face/lips.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Kidney function and potassium checked periodically.
ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARBs)
losartan, valsartan
Risk Reduction
-
Similar to ACE inhibitors in many settings (17–22% reported in your Text 1)
-
Also reported as ~10–13% reduction in cardiovascular events (your Text 2)
How they work
-
Similar vascular benefits to ACE inhibitors via a different mechanism.
Who needs them
-
Often used when ACE inhibitors cause cough or are not tolerated.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Dose varies; titrated to blood pressure and tolerance.
Side effects
-
Generally well tolerated; less cough than ACE inhibitors.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Kidney function and potassium checked periodically.
BETA BLOCKERS
metoprolol, carvedilol, bisoprolol
Risk Reduction
-
23% reduction in death after heart attack
-
27% reduction in recurrent heart attacks (secondary prevention)
How they work
-
Slow heart rate and reduce blood pressure, lowering the heart’s workload.
Who needs them
-
Especially beneficial after a heart attack and/or with heart failure (and some arrhythmias), as directed by clinician.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Dose varies by medication and condition.
Side effects
-
Fatigue, cold hands/feet; may worsen asthma in some patients.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Heart rate, blood pressure, symptoms monitored during titration.
ASPIRIN
Bayer
Risk Reduction
-
20–23% reduction in major cardiovascular events in people with known heart disease
-
30% reduction in recurrent heart attack in secondary prevention
-
Primary prevention: 10–12% reduction in heart attacks but similar increase in bleeding risk
How they work
-
Prevents clotting by stopping platelets from sticking together.
Who needs them
-
Primarily secondary prevention (prior heart attack, stroke, stent, known coronary disease). Primary prevention requires careful individualized discussion.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Loading dose (acute heart attack): 162–325 mg
-
Maintenance: 75–100 mg daily (often 81 mg daily)
Side effects
-
Increased bleeding risk, stomach upset, ulcers; serious bleeding ~1–2% over several years.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Watch for unusual bleeding/bruising; discuss whether benefits outweigh bleeding risk.
P2Y12 INHIBITORS
clopidogrel/Plavix, ticagrelor/Brilinta, prasugrel/Effient
Risk Reduction
-
~20% reduction in cardiovascular events when combined with aspirin after heart attack or stent (dual antiplatelet therapy)
How they work
-
Prevent clot formation through a different platelet pathway than aspirin.
Who needs them
-
Typically prescribed 6–12 months after a heart attack or stent (sometimes longer in selected cases).
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Taken daily; agent and duration chosen by clinician.
Side effects
-
Increased bleeding risk, bruising.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Do not stop without medical guidance, especially if you have a stent.
RIVAROXABAN
Xarelto - low dose with aspirin
Risk Reduction
-
24% reduction in major cardiovascular events when added to aspirin in stable coronary/peripheral artery disease (selected high-risk patients)
How they work
-
Anticoagulant that reduces clot formation through a mechanism different from aspirin.
Who needs them
-
Selected high-risk patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease after individualized bleeding-risk review.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 81 mg daily.
Side effects
-
Increased bleeding risk; major bleeding reported to increase from 1.9% to 2.7%.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Requires careful clinician-guided risk/benefit discussion.
COLCHICINE
Colcrys
Risk Reduction
-
23–31% reduction in major cardiovascular events
-
26% reduction in heart attacks
-
46% reduction in stroke
-
After heart attack: 23% risk reduction reported
How they work
-
Reduces inflammation in blood vessels that contributes to plaque buildup and rupture.
Who needs them
-
People with stable coronary disease or recent heart attack, as add-on to standard therapies.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
0.5 mg daily.
Side effects
-
Diarrhea/stomach upset in about 10%; often early and improves.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Minimal monitoring required.
SGLT2 INHIBITORS
empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin
Risk Reduction
-
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): 9-14% reduction in composite of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death.
-
Cardiovascular death: 14-16% reduction
-
Heart failure hospitalization: 27-31% reduction (the most robust benefit of this class)
-
All-cause mortality: 13-15% reduction
-
Myocardial infarction: 10-11% reduction (modest effect)
-
Kidney disease progression: significant reduction in people with established ASCVD, multiple risk factors, or albuminuric kidney disease.
How they work
-
Reduce plasma glucose by enhancing urinary excretion of glucose through inhibition of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 in the kidney.
-
Cardiovascular and kidney benefits occur largely independent of glycemic management.
Who needs them
-
People with type 2 diabetes and established ASCVD, indicators of high ASCVD risk, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease- recommended independent of A1C level, with or without metformin use.
-
Individuals already at glycemic goal with other medications may benefit from switching to SGLT2 inhibitors to reduce cardiovascular and kidney risk.
-
Benefits observed across the full range of heart failure risk, though greater reductions occur in those with higher baseline risk.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Oral medications taken once daily
-
Glycemic efficacy is intermediate-to-high but lower at reduced eGFR[3]
-
Can be used in combination with GLP-1 receptor agonists for additive cardiovascular and kidney benefits.
Side effects
-
Mycotic genital infections (typically mild and treatable).
-
Diabetic ketoacidosis: low incidence (0.1-0.6% in cardiovascular outcome trials vs. <0.1-0.3% with placebo).
-
Not recommended in type 1 diabetesdue to significant increase in diabetic ketoacidosis and euglycemic ketoacidosis.
-
Lower risk of hypoglycemia compared to other glucose-lowering agents.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Particularly important for individuals with ASCVD, heart failure, and CKD who have higher hypoglycemia risk than those without these conditions.
-
FDA-approved indications include reducing cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin) and reducing MACE in type 2 diabetes with established cardiovascular disease (canagliflozin, empagliflozin)
GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS
Liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, albiglutide, efpeglenatide
Agents WITHOUT demonstrated cardiovascular benefit:Lixisenatide and extended-release exenatide were not superior to placebo and are not recommended for CVD risk reduction
Risk Reduction
-
Major atherosclerotic cardiovascular outcomes (MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death): comparable reduction to SGLT2 inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes and established ASCVD.
-
Heart failure hospitalization: reduced risk in people with established ASCVD, multiple risk factors, or albuminuric kidney disease.
-
Kidney disease progression: reduced risk.
-
In the GRADE trial (individuals with relatively short diabetes duration without established CVD): 30% reduction in cardiovascular events (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9) with liraglutide compared to insulin glargine, glimepiride, or sitagliptin.
How they work
-
Activate glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors to enhance glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppress glucagon, slow gastric emptying, and promote satiety
-
Cardiovascular and kidney benefits occur largely independent of glycemic management.
Who needs them
-
People with type 2 diabetes and established ASCVD, indicators of high ASCVD risk, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease- recommended independent of A1C level, with or without metformin use.
-
People with type 2 diabetes, obesity, and symptomatic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction- GLP-1 RAs or dual GIP/GLP-1 RAs with demonstrated benefits are specifically recommended.
-
Individuals at lower (moderate) CVD risk may still benefit from GLP-1 RA therapy to reduce future cardiovascular events.
-
Individuals already at glycemic goal with other medications may benefit from switching to GLP-1 RAs to reduce cardiovascular and kidney risk.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Available as once-daily (liraglutide) or once-weekly (semaglutide, dulaglutide) subcutaneous injections
-
Oral formulation of semaglutide also available with demonstrated cardiovascular benefit.
-
Can be used in combination with SGLT2 inhibitors for additive cardiovascular and kidney benefits.
Side effects
-
Gastrointestinal effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) are common
-
Lower risk of hypoglycemia compared to other glucose-lowering agents.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Particularly important for individuals with ASCVD, heart failure, and CKD who have higher hypoglycemia risk than those without these conditions.
-
Cardiovascular outcome trials of the dual GIP/GLP-1 RA tirzepatide are ongoing.
-
Individuals with type 2 diabetes and moderate levels of CVD risk derive cardiovascular and mortality benefits with preferential use of GLP-1 RAs compared with sulfonylureas or DPP-4 inhibitors.
MEDITERRANEAN DIET
Diet
Risk Reduction
-
After a heart attack (Lyon Diet Heart Study):
-
Cardiovascular death reduction: 65–76%
-
All-cause death reduction: 56%
-
Recurrent heart attack reduction: 73%
-
Major cardiovascular events reduction: 70%
-
-
Primary prevention (PREDIMED):
-
Major cardiovascular events reduction: 30%
-
Stroke reduction: 40–42%
-
-
Overall Mediterranean diet benefits (as reported in your Text 2):
-
All deaths reduction: 28%
-
Cardiovascular death reduction: 41–45%
-
Heart attack reduction: 52%
-
Stroke reduction: 35%
-
How they work
-
Reduces inflammation, improves cholesterol and blood pressure, and provides antioxidants that protect blood vessels.
Who needs them
-
Everyone at risk for cardiovascular disease; especially powerful for people with known coronary disease.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Emphasize: vegetables, fruits, whole grains, beans, nuts, olive oil, fish
-
Moderate: poultry, eggs, cheese, yogurt
-
Limit: red meat, sweets, ultra-processed foods
-
Use extra-virgin olive oil as primary fat
-
Eat fish at least twice weekly (salmon, sardines, mackerel)
Side effects
-
No meaningful adverse effects; discuss calories/weight goals if needed.
Monitoring / Important notes
EXERCISE & PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
Exercise
Risk Reduction
-
Cardiac rehabilitation (after heart attack):
-
All-cause death reduction: 13–20%
-
Cardiovascular death reduction: 26–36%
-
Heart attack reduction: 18–47%
-
Hospitalization reduction: 23–42%
-
Number needed to treat: 37 to prevent one cardiovascular death or hospitalization
-
-
Regular physical activity (prevention):
-
Cardiovascular death reduction: 23–40%
-
All-cause death reduction: 27–31%
-
In stable heart disease with high-volume exercise (10–20 hrs/week): ~50% reduction in cardiovascular events
-
How they work
-
Improves blood vessel function, blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, inflammation, and cardiac efficiency.
Who needs them
-
Everyone; cardiac rehab is especially important after heart attack or stent.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Minimum: 150 minutes/week moderate (brisk walking) or 75 minutes/week vigorous (jogging)
-
Strength training 2 days/week
-
Cardiac rehab: structured, supervised program after heart attack
Side effects
-
Injury risk if overdone; start gradually and follow clinician guidance.
SMOKING CESSATION
Smoking cessation
Risk Reduction
-
After heart attack:
-
Cardiovascular death reduction: 36–39%
-
Major cardiovascular events reduction: 43%
-
All-cause death reduction: 40%
-
Heart attack reduction: 36%
-
Stroke reduction: 30%
-
How they work
-
Reduces clotting tendency, inflammation, vessel spasm, and plaque progression; improves oxygen delivery.
Who needs them
-
Anyone who smokes or uses tobacco/nicotine products.
Typical dose / Implementation
-
Choose a quit date; consider counseling + pharmacotherapy if needed.
Side effects
-
Withdrawal symptoms (cravings, irritability, insomnia) are common early and improve over time.
Monitoring / Important notes
-
Timeline of benefit:
-
After 1 year: ~50% reduction in heart disease risk
-
After 15 years: risk approaches never-smoker levels
-
Heavy smokers: may require ~25 years to reach never-smoker risk levels
-
REFERENCES
-
Lipid Management for the Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2019. Michos ED, McEvoy JW, Blumenthal RS.
-
Evaluating the Association Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction and Relative and Absolute Effects of Statin Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2022. Byrne P, Demasi M, Jones M, et al.
-
Pharmacological Lipid-Modification Therapies for Prevention of Ischaemic Heart Disease: Current and Future Options. Lancet. 2019. Ray KK, Corral P, Morales E, Nicholls SJ.
-
Interpretation of the Evidence for the Efficacy and Safety of Statin Therapy. Lancet. 2016. Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, et al.
-
Pleiotropic Effects of Statins on the Cardiovascular System. Circulation Research. 2017. Oesterle A, Laufs U, Liao JK.
-
FDA Orange Book. FDA Orange Book. 2026.
-
The Evolving Future of PCSK9 Inhibitors. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018. Rosenson RS, Hegele RA, Fazio S, Cannon CP.
-
Safety of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin 9 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Heart. 2022. Li J, Du H, Wang Y, et al.
-
PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibodies for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020. Schmidt AF, Carter JL, Pearce LS, et al.
-
Safety and Effectiveness of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibition: An Updated Review. Current Opinion in Lipidology. 2025. Pamporis K, Karakasis P, Tsiachris D.
-
Evaluation and Management of Patients With Stable Angina: Beyond the Ischemia Paradigm: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020. Ferraro R, Latina JM, Alfaddagh A, et al.
-
Acute Coronary Syndromes. Lancet. 2022. Bergmark BA, Mathenge N, Merlini PA, Lawrence-Wright MB, Giugliano RP.
-
Effects of Icosapent Ethyl on Total Ischemic Events: From REDUCE-IT. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, et al.
-
From Early Pharmacology to Recent Pharmacology Interventions In Acute Coronary Syndromes: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019. Szummer K, Jernberg T, Wallentin L.
-
Antiplatelet Drugs: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th Ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012. Eikelboom JW, Hirsh J, Spencer FA, Baglin TP, Weitz JI.
-
Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th Ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012. Vandvik PO, Lincoff AM, Gore JM, et al.
-
Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2022. Guirguis-Blake JM, Evans CV, Perdue LA, Bean SI, Senger CA.
-
2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2025. Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al.
-
Acute Myocardial Infarction. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2017. Anderson JL, Morrow DA.
-
Update on the Use of PCSK9 Inhibitors in Adults: Recommendations From an Expert Panel of the National Lipid Association. Journal of Clinical Lipidology. 2017. Orringer CE, Jacobson TA, Saseen JJ, et al.
-
2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023. Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, et al.
-
Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease: JACC Review Topic of the Week. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023. Nelson K, Fuster V, Ridker PM.
-
Colchicine in Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease in Relation to Prior Acute Coronary Syndrome. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021. Opstal TSJ, Fiolet ATL, van Broekhoven A, et al.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarction. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2019. Tardif JC, Kouz S, Waters DD, et al.
-
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2019. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, et al.
-
Preventive Cardiology as a Subspecialty of Cardiovascular Medicine: JACC Council Perspectives. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019. Shapiro MD, Maron DJ, Morris PB, et al.
-
Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease: 2025 ACC Scientific Statement: A Report of the American College of Cardiology. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2025. Mensah GA, Arnold N, Prabhu SD, Ridker PM, Welty FK.
-
Mediterranean Diet, Traditional Risk Factors, and the Rate of Cardiovascular Complications After Myocardial Infarction: Final Report of the Lyon Diet Heart Study. Circulation. 1999. de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Martin JL, et al.
-
A Pesco-Mediterranean Diet With Intermittent Fasting: JACC Review Topic of the Week. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020. O'Keefe JH, Torres-Acosta N, O'Keefe EL, et al.
-
Mediterranean-Style Diet for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019. Rees K, Takeda A, Martin N, et al.
-
Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet Supplemented with Extra-Virgin Olive Oil or Nuts. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2018. Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvadó J, et al.
-
Comparison of Seven Popular Structured Dietary Programmes and Risk of Mortality and Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients at Increased Cardiovascular Risk: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. BMJ. 2023. Karam G, Agarwal A, Sadeghirad B, et al.
-
Effects of Dietary Interventions on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Network Meta-Analysis. Nutrition Reviews. 2024. Doundoulakis I, Farmakis IT, Theodoridis X, et al.
-
Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021. Dibben G, Faulkner J, Oldridge N, et al.
-
Reprint Of: Promoting Physical Activity and Exercise: JACC Health Promotion Series. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018. Fletcher GF, Landolfo C, Niebauer J, et al.
-
Promoting Physical Activity and Exercise: JACC Health Promotion Series. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018. Fletcher GF, Landolfo C, Niebauer J, et al.
-
Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis. European Heart Journal. 2023. Dibben GO, Faulkner J, Oldridge N, et al.
-
Efficacy of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Post-Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. American Heart Journal. 2011. Lawler PR, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ.
-
Exercise for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: JACC Focus Seminar 1/4. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2022. Tucker WJ, Fegers-Wustrow I, Halle M, et al.
-
Smoking Cessation for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022. Wu AD, Lindson N, Hartmann-Boyce J, et al.
-
Reprint Of: Prevention and Treatment of Tobacco Use: JACC Health Promotion Series. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018. Kalkhoran S, Benowitz NL, Rigotti NA.
-
Prevention and Treatment of Tobacco Use: JACC Health Promotion Series. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018. Kalkhoran S, Benowitz NL, Rigotti NA.
-
Association Between Cigarette Smoking Status, Intensity, and Cessation Duration With Long-Term Incidence of Nine Cardiovascular and Mortality Outcomes: The Cross-Cohort Collaboration (CCC). PLoS Medicine. 2025. Tasdighi E, Yao Z, Dardari ZA, et al.
-
Association of Smoking Cessation With Subsequent Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2019. Duncan MS, Freiberg MS, Greevy RA, et al.
-
Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease. JAMA Network Open. 2024. Cho JH, Shin SY, Kim H, et al.
